SSR
Criterion 1 - Curricular Aspects
Key Indicator – 1.1 Curricular Planning and Implementation
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 1.1.1 |
The Institution ensures effective curriculum delivery through a well-planned and documented process | 
|
| 1.1.2 | The institution adheres to the academic calendar including for the conduct of CIE | |
| 1.1.3 | Teachers of the Institution participate in following activities related to curriculum development and assessment of the affiliating University and/are represented on the following academic bodies during the last five years |
|
Key Indicator – 1.2 Academic Flexibility
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 1.2.1 |
Percentage of Programmes in which Choice Based Credit System (CBCS)/ elective course system has been implemented | |
| 1.2.2 | Number of Add on /Certificate programs offered during the last five years | |
| 1.2.3 | Average percentage of students enrolled in Add-on/Certificate programs as against the total number of students during the last five years | |
Key Indicator – 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 1.3.1 |
Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability into the Curriculum | |
| 1.3.2 | Average percentage of courses that include experiential learning through project work/field work/internship during last five years | |
| 1.3.3 | Percentage of students undertaking project work/field work / internship (Data for the latest completed academic year) | |
Key Indicator – 1.4 Feedback System
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 1.4.1 |
Institution obtains feedback on the syllabus and its transaction at the institution from the following stakeholders
1)Students 2)Teachers 3)Employers 4)Alumni |
|
| 1.4.2 | Feedback process of the Institution may be classified as follows: Options:
|
|
Criterion 2 - Teaching- Learning and Evaluation
Key Indicator – 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 2.1.1 |
Average Enrolment percentage (Average of last five years) | |
| 2.1.2 | Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy) during the last five years ( exclusive of supernumerary seats) |
Key Indicator – 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 2.2.1 |
The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners | |
| 2.2.2 | Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | |
Key Indicator – 2.3 Teaching- Learning Process
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 2.3.1 | Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences
|
|
| 2.3.2 | Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process. | |
| 2.3.3 | Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year) | |
Key Indicator – 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 2.4.1 | Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years | |
| 2.4.2 | Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count) | |
| 2.4.3 | Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years) | |
Key Indicator – 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 2.5.1 | Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode |
|
| 2.5.2 | Mechanism to deal with internal/external examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient | |
Key Indicator – 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 2.6.1 | Programme and course outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students | |
| 2.6.2 | Attainment of programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution | |
| 2.6.3 | Average pass percentage of Students during last five years | |
Key Indicator – 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 2.7.1 | Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. | |
Criterion 3 - Research, Innovations and Extension
Key Indicator – 3.1 Resource Mobilization for Research
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 3.1.1 |
Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects, endowments, Chairs in the institution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | |
| 3.1.2 | Percentage of teachers recognized as research guides (latest completed academic year) | |
Key Indicator – 3.2 Innovation Ecosystem
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 3.2.1 |
Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations and has initiatives for creation and transfer of knowledge | |
| 3.2.2 | Number of workshops/seminars conducted on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship during the last five years | |
Key Indicator – 3.3 Research Publication and Awards
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 3.3.1 |
Number of Ph.Ds registered per eligible teacher during the last five years | |
| 3.3.2 | Number of research papers per teachers in the Journals notified on UGC website during the last five years | |
| 3.3.3 | Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years | |
Key Indicator – 3.4 Extension Activities
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 3.4.1 |
Extension activities are carried out in the neighborhood community, sensitizing students to social issues, for their holistic development, and impact thereof during the last five years. | |
| 3.4.2 | Number of awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government/ government recognised bodies during the last five years | |
| 3.4.3 | Number of extension and outreach Programmes conducted by the institution through NSS/ NCC/ Red Cross/ YRC etc., ( including the programmes such as Swachh Bharat, AIDS awareness, Gender issues etc. )and/or those organised in collaboration with industry, community and NGOs during the last five years | |
Key Indicator – 3.5 Collaboration
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 3.5.1 |
Number of Collaborative activities for research, Faculty exchange, Student exchange/ internship per year | |
| 3.5.2 | Number of functional MoUs with institutions, other universities, industries, corporate houses etc. during the last five years | |
Criterion 4 - Infrastructure and Learning Resources
Key Indicator – 4.1 Physical Facilities
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 4.1.1 |
The Institution has adequate infrastructure and physical facilities for teaching- learning. viz., classrooms, laboratories, computing equipment etc. | |
| 4.1.2 | The Institution has adequate facilities for cultural activities, sports, games (indoor, outdoor), gymnasium, yoga etc. | |
| 4.1.3 | Percentage of classrooms and seminar halls with ICT- enabled facilities such as smart class, LMS, etc. | |
Key Indicator – 4.2 Library as a learning Resource
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 4.2.1 |
Library is automated using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS) | |
| 4.2.2 | The institution has subscription for the following e-resources:
|
|
Key Indicator – 4.3 IT Infrastructure
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 4.3.1 |
Institution frequently updates its IT facilities including Wi-Fi | |
Key Indicator – 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 4.4.2 | There are established systems and procedures for maintaining and utilizing physical, academic and support facilities - laboratory, library, sports complex, computers, classrooms etc. | |
Criterion 5 - Student Support and Progression
Key Indicator – 5.1 Student Support
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 5.1.1 |
Average percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the Government during last five years | |
| 5.1.2 | Average percentage of students benefitted by scholarships, freeships etc. provided by the institution / non- government agencies during the last five years | |
| 5.1.3 | Capacity building and skills enhancement initiatives taken by the institution include the following
|
|
| 5.1.4 | Average percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counselling offered by the Institution during the last five years | |
| 5.1.5 | The Institution has a transparent mechanism for timely redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases |
|
Key Indicator – 5.2 Student Progression
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 5.2.1 |
Average percentage of placement of outgoing students during the last five years | |
| 5.2.3 | Average percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years (eg: JAM/ NET/SLET/GATE/ GMAT/CAT/GRE/ TOEFL/ Civil Services/State government examinations, etc.) | |
Key Indicator – 5.3 Student Participation and Activities
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 5.3.1 |
Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities at university/state/national / international level (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last five years. | |
Key Indicator – 5.4 Alumni Engagement
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 5.4.1 |
There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services | |
Criterion 6 - Governance, Leadership and Management
Key Indicator – 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 6.1.1 |
The governance of the institution is reflective of and in tune with the vision and mission of the institution | |
| 6.1.2 | The effective leadership is visible in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management | |
Key Indicator – 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 6.2.1 |
The institutional Strategic/ perspective plan is effectively deployed | |
| 6.2.2 | The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, etc. | |
| 6.2.3 | Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation | |
Key Indicator – 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 6.3.1 |
The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff | |
| 6.3.2 | Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years | |
| 6.3.3 | Average number of professional development /administrative training programs organized by the institution for teaching and non teaching staff during the last five years | |
| 6.3.4 | Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDP) during the last five years | |
| 6.3.5 | Institutions Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff | |
Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 6.4.1 |
Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly | |
| 6.4.2 | Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropers during the last five years (not covered in Criterion III) | |
| 6.4.3 | Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources | |
Key Indicator – 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 6.5.1 |
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes | |
| 6.5.2 | The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms and recorded the incremental improvement in various activities | |
| 6.5.3 | Quality assurance initiatives of the institution | |
Criterion 7 - Institutional Values and Best Practices
Key Indicator – 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 7.1.1 |
Measures initiated by the Institution for the promotion of gender equity during the last five years. | |
| 7.1.2 | The Institution has facilities for alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures | |
| 7.1.3 | Describe the facilities in the Institution for the management of the following types of degradable and non-degradable waste | |
| 7.1.4 | Water conservation facilities available in the Institution | |
| 7.1.5 | Green campus initiatives | |
| 7.1.6 | Quality audits on environment and energy are regularly undertaken by the institution | |
| 7.1.7 | The Institution has disabled-friendly, barrier free environment | |
| 7.1.8 | Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic and other diversities | |
| 7.1.9 | Sensitization of students and employees of the Institution to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens | |
| 7.1.10 | The Institution has a prescribed code of conduct for students, teachers, administrators and other staff and conducts periodic programmes in this regard. | |
| 7.1.11 | Institution celebrates / organizes national and international commemorative days, events and festivals | |
Key Indicator – 7.2 Best Practices
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 7.2.1 |
Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual. | |
Key Indicator – 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
| Metric No. | Metric Details | Web-link |
| 7.3.1 |
Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words | |